🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.